The SDDC Isn’t The Cloud

6a00d8341c767353ef0163035895e8970d-320wi

The genesis of this post actually came from former EMC vSpecialist/SDSpecialist and Mid-tier team lead, Scott Drummonds; Scott is a great evangelist for virtualization and cloud computing in APJ.  I recently heard him talk about the Software-Defined Data Center (SDDC) with Craig Waters, on one of Craig’s very informative  vCatchup podcasts.  Shortly after that, Scott posted, on his blog, a video of himself walking through a presentation on EMC and the SDDC.

That got me thinking about how to properly position converged infrastructure systems, such as a Vblock, in the context of the SDDC.  Not long after, Scott started an internal e-mail thread, asking for feedback on his presentation and for different takes on the SDDC message.  My response to his e-mail is the basis for this blog post.

Is the SDDC Another Term for Cloud?

I’ve been in several conversations, both on-line and in-person, where folks have asked or have suggested that the SDDC is another word for Cloud or Cloud services.  In response, I’ve tried to distinguish the following terms:

The end-state = IT-as-a-Service
Operational and consumption model = Cloud
Enabling technologies = Virtualization, Automation, SDDC, etc.

The end-state is the long-term vision of transforming IT into a service provider for their end-users/consumers.  The current best way to achieve that vision is through Cloud Computing models like IaaS and PaaS.  Technologies like SDDC pave the road to that long-term vision by enabling IT models like Cloud Computing.

What is the true SDDC?

The big architectural change initiated by the concept of the Software-Defined Data Center is the separation of the control and data planes.  For me, the true SDDC enables or potentially enables several important capabilities:

  • The ability to manage the entire data center as a single unified system or as an aggregation of  different sets of infrastructure domains, like compute, networking, storage, etc. and not merely as an amalgamation of components. Or the ability to manage all the devices, such as routers and switches, that belong to a single domain, such as networking, using a single controller.
  • The ability to have the entire data center infrastructure be managed and provisioned programmatically in software.  Every component in the infrastructure should have programming interfaces exposed that allow fine-grained control of the services provided by those components.  Even better, what if the entire infrastructure stack could expose APIs that allow it to be programmed as a single integrated system via a single centralized controller, enabling true automation.
  • The ability for the control plane to dynamically change the infrastructure based on information it receives from the data plane.  The current state of the “Hardware-Defined Data Center” is that configurations are static and difficult to manage.  But what if the infrastructure could be changed on-the-fly to meet changing requirements.  One possible use case could be an application running in a Cloud that needs to burst up capacity.  In a true SDDC the infrastructure underneath the private cloud could be programmed to dynamically “spin-up” new VMs with requisite compute, network, or storage being provisioned alongside; once those resources are no longer needed, the infrastructure would be able to respond by automatically decommissioning VMs and de-provsioning the associated hardware.

The benefits of the features listed above are that they enable important characteristics of the Cloud, such as elasticity and automation.

What are your thoughts on the Software-Defined Data Center and how do you see it changing the way you do business, whether you are a vendor, selling Cloud enabling technologies or an end-user, looking to transform your IT into a service provider for your business?

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. […] (IaaS) Clouds, some have conflated SDDC with Cloud Computing.  In a previous post, The SDDC Isn’t The Cloud, I argued that the SDDC, as VMware envisions it, is not synonymous with the Cloud but is an […]

  2. […] 是什么呢? 我们先要理解云计算和VMWare提倡的软件定义数据中心(Software-Defined Data Center)之间的关联。VMWare的软件定义数据中心理念已经深入人心,也是他们的战略方向。不过正如Kenneth Hui之前文章里面谈到的, The SDDC Isn’t The Cloud,软件定义数据中心是云计算的核心技术但不等于是云计算的同义词。云计算平台,比如OpenStack,通过自动化技术将虚拟的资源以灵活可用地以服务的方式交付,并能支撑大规模的弹性扩展;而软件定义数据中心的要义在于将软硬件资源变成可以编程控制的云计算元素(the code/element to program)。从灵活调度软硬件资源的角度,需要一个可编程接口或者说controller,云平台比如OpenStack正是这一层次,提供端到端的灵活管理和调度,以满足云的自动化、弹性和无限扩展。 […]

  3. […] alone does not defined what it means to be Software-Defined Storage.  As I written in an earlier post, SDS is not strictly about the abstraction of physical storage or even the abstraction of the […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: